Nothing else seen in the demo, mentioned in the article, or present in footage paints the doom-scenerio that the game is unbalanced due to the. However, the only thing supporting the attacking end is that it's an EA game and bad usage in unrelated products. There's nothing wrong with it being an issue if the arguments hold up. This is the type of DLC that I am perfectly okay with because everything is already available for me to play with as it would normally be, but those without patience and who have more money than time will be able to access it as well.
"Seeing 'Access Downloadable Content' takes me out of the game." - Oh, that ruins the immersion but all of the button prompts and silly stat bars for weapons don't? The word 'Continue' is perfectly acceptable? 'Game Over'? "Now I have to grind to catch up to these pay to winners." - Are you directly competing with these people for something? Also, by grind, do you mean 'explore the environment' like you had to do to get those upgrade nodes in DS1 and 2? It's not like the enemies continuously respawned in any particular location besides that shit at the end of DS2. what? Is your self-control really that low where you're easily tempted to buy something that you don't want to buy? "Big Business is preying on the weak-willed!" - I. "What about my sense of accomplishment? Knowing that other people have the same weapon as me without looking in every nook and cranny lowers my self-esteem." - What does it matter what other people do? Can you only feel good about something after comparing it to someone else's experiences? I think the arguments against this are far weaker.
0 kommentar(er)
